![]() ![]() That's the only way I can use a MacBook (or iPad). I also could pick a device that didn't use PWM for screen brightness, which means I can now use my laptop without sun shades and avoid a migraine. Ended up saving $850, and still get better Resolve performance due to the GPU disparity (and a Ryzen 9 CPU is no slouch, anyways). I ended up returning mine and getting a PC Laptop instead. ![]() Final Cut Pro is Apple software, and can only be used on a Mac, whereas Blackmagic Design’s DaVinci Resolve works well on both PCs and Macs. My guess is that iMacs will come with the same setup and stipulations. DaVinci Resolve: Cross-Platform Editing: No, Mac only: Yes, works on Mac or Windows: Price: 299.99 USD + Free Trial: 295 USD + Free Version. $400 for 768GB of NVMe storage is insane. My issue with these machines is that they are too expensive to "spec up." I bought an M1 MBP with 16GB RAM and 1TB SSD and it was $2,012 after taxes. Apple needs to (and will obviously) release better spec packages. These current M1 machines are entry-level. Resolve is an exaggeration of this.Īnything GPU intensive will see PCs with decent dGPUs - even mid-range cards - outrun the M1. The CPU performance of the M1 is impressive, but more and more software are moving in a direction where the GPU is becoming more and more important. Resolve really needs an 8GB or better GPU for 4K work which the M1 cannot yet compete with.Įven Laptops with i7s/Ryzen 7 or 9 and RTX2060 will perform better because the GPU is the differentiator with Resolve. ![]() But even a modest PC desktop with 16GB RAM and an 8GB GPU will run Resolve much faster than a Mac M1 in my experience. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |